Legalitas Pelayanan Perizinan Berbasis Online di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah

The Legality of Online-Based Licensing Services in Central Sulawesi Province

  • Muhamad Jauhari Program Studi Magister Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Tadulako Palu, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia
  • Surahman Surahman Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako Palu, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia
  • Awaluddin Awaluddin Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako Palu, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia
  • Syamsuddin Baco Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako Palu, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia
  • Asri Lasatu Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Tadulako Palu, Sulawesi Tengah, Indonesia
Kata Kunci: Legality, authority, licensing

Abstrak

The enactment of Government Regulation (GR) No. 28 of 2025th on Risk-Based Business Licensing has not been automatically followed by regulatory adjustments at the regional level nor by improvements to the electronically integrated licensing system (Online Single Submission). This condition has legal implications for the validity of business licenses and has hindered the delivery of licensing services administered by the Investment and One-Stop Integrated Services Office (DPMPTSP) of Central Sulawesi Province. This research aims to examine the extent of the juridical implications of the implementation of The enactment of Government Regulation on the legitimacy and authority of the Head of DPMPTSP in administering licensing services in Central Sulawesi. This study employs normative legal research, using a statutory approach, and a conceptual approach, which are analyzed and presented prescriptively. The findings indicate that the enactment of GR No. 28 of 2025 does not affect the institutional authority of the Head of DPMPTSP; however, its substantive authority related to types of licenses, including licensing norms, standards, procedures, and criteria, requires adjustments to the Governor’s Regulation in conformity with GR No. 28 of 2025 in order to ensure legal legitimacy.

Referensi

Adrian Sutedi. (2015). Hukum Perizinan Dalam Sektor Pelayanan Publik (1 ed.). Sinar Grafika.

Asshiddiqie, J. (2012). Gagasan Negara Hukum Indonesia. Majalah hukum nasional, 1–17. https://www.pn-gunungsitoli.go.id/assets/image/files/Konsep_Negara_Hukum_Indonesia.pdf

Fuady, M. (2009). Teori Negara Hukum Modern (Rechtstaat). Refika Aditama.

Irwansyah. (2021). Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel (M. B. Media (ed.)). Mirra Buana Media.

Lutfi J Kurniawan. (2012). Perihal Negara Hukum dan Kebijakan Publik. Perspektif Politik Kesejahteraan, Kearifan Lokal, Yang Pro Civil Society Dan Gender. Setara Press.

Marlien Irene Matitaputy, et. a. (2024). Hukum Administrasi Negara (1 ed.). Widinia Media Utama.

Pasaribu, T. (2025). Fiktif Positif Jadi Senjata Baru Kepastian Layanan Perizinan.

Peter Mahmud. (2010). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana.

Qazi, F., Kwak, D., Gul, F., Ali, F., & Ullah, S. (2024). Internet of Things Service Level Agreement in cloud computing : Taxonomy , prospects , and challenges. Internet of Things, 25(October 2023), 101126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2024.101126

Siregar, M. (2024). Teori Hukum Progresif dalam Konsep Negara Hukum Indonesia. Muhammadiyah Law Review, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24127/mlr.v8i2.3567

Diterbitkan
2025-12-31
Bagaimana Mengutip
Jauhari, M., Surahman, S., Awaluddin, A., Baco, S., & Lasatu, A. (2025). Legalitas Pelayanan Perizinan Berbasis Online di Provinsi Sulawesi Tengah. Bomba: Jurnal Pembangunan Daerah, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.65123/bomba.v5i2.98
Bagian
Articles